Life? What Life?

Mine's as dull as this blog is nulled.
ooh hey. what a post for 2006 =]

Life---Kids are a blessing? Think again.

*Curses as it is now 3.27am when I'm writing this for the second time after I hit the refresh button by mistake*

Whats my issue this time? Kids. And my definition qualifies any person under the age of 12.

Remember back in the days where a bowl of noodles cost twenty cents? Inflation has it that a bowl can cost up to three dollars, and while that is happening, so is the inflation of employee's wages. Link that to an ideal 21st century family, having a picturesque image of a family of 3 when the mother is now free to leave her child to faith. I'm thinking of the time when I, being brought up in a lightly more well-off family, had a handphone at the age of 12, and hell, it wasn't even expensive as comparing to the likes of today's technology, yet walk around and I doubt anyone will be surprised when a seven year old is sending text messages on the latest model. If i'm picturing the teens these innocent little people will grow up to if they're uncontrolled, I'l be wishing they had the phone right from their mother's womb and actually not be a waste of taxpayer's money as such of what my eye sees, spending years and years and years of taxpayers' money on education, only to receive a certificate fit for the barbecue pit. Translate that added income to a higher daily allowance for the kid and i'm probably guess that you will have a delinquent on your doorstep in years to come.
Also, tell me, does the silent mode so prevailent in handphones today actually serve its purpose when the delinquents don't even realize why it is placed there for, and on that note, doesn't 'social etiquette' stand within them? SHEESH, ANSWER YOUR FORSAKEN PHONE ALREADY AND TURN OFF THAT CRAP-ASS LAME RINGTONE WHICH YOU HAPPEN TO THINK IS FUNKY, WELL FUNKY MY BIG WHITE ASS.
So you reward them for doing well in school every time, maybe by adding a certain amount to their daily allowance or giving out to them something they wish for. You believe that rewarding them after each and every success motivates them to do well, but then that is the average lay-persion's thought. It is a proven and reserached issue that if you only give out rewards at unexpected times and more importantly using th element of surpirise will the memory of the lesson be remembered for a greater duration fo time. Lets picture a bunch of sore losers who don't realize their standing in society in an attempt to intimidate a person 1 foot taller and porobably 30kilogrammes heavier as well as larger by mass. Stupid? I believe its an insult to the word. In my opinion, the ideal reward for the kid when he does well in school is to give him the opportunity for furthering his education.
i'm picturing a family where the parent are working people and the care of heir children is left to their belief in a god for guidiance and then pray for their kid to grow up and mature with grace. That was a joke people. I'm sparing the thought that ifi an individual will grow up into rejects of society, let's validate sympathy killing at birth, when their brain defects can be dected by the lack of a brain. Issues where taxpayers' money are just send rolling down the drain by delinquents who are given a chance at education but spend more the average student only to acquire a certificate fit to fire a charcoal pit for 8 seconds. Insensitive aren't I? Nope. I beg to differ as you would expect me to do.
I will definitely not say that I or anyone else on this planet is virtuous(since its a definition entitled to humans by other humans of equal status) but I was witnessing this kid drop coins into his hopper at this amusement part, over and over and over, running to and from the cashier who never failed to devliver a smirk every time his back was turned. I was not in the same liability status as the cashier so I was not smirking but actually laughing. The amount spent by a kid almost six, maybe more, years younger than I would have the capacity to spend more than me just for amusement's sake. If i did my math right, the combined expenditure on one pair of hoppers for the two kids in reference is amost eight times the combined expenditure of the owner of this blog and my expenditure at the same pare of hoppers.
Vack on the track of the little people who are able to be using a handphone actually don't thnk of it as an accessory but as a point for flaunting. If they may allow me to state my 150,000 dollar grand piano sitting in my hallway, I believe they should now where they stand in society, not 1 notch below me, but 1 notch below the five-hundred-thousandth person below me.

I had a deprived childhood? maybe, who knows.
~Frozen Lestat~

Life's the way it is, or NOT.

*****post by an infidel, social reject.******

Its been an interesting life thus far, amusingly there are phenomenon's of actual people with heads as filled as a prick and then there was the time when faith ruled the world and especially in god. Someone posed a question, "Faith in God exists even through all the mishaps, but that faith never dies. But, has anyone ever seen god"

The endless pursuit on answering the questions which should remain unanswered and in god do we seek solace. Right now, my view has changed, although not in favour of the believers. Analytical viewpoints but from a perspective view, result in the reasoning that human psychology requires an answer to every question and how the more inexplicable ones are diverted to a separate cause instead of one supported by literacy. Citing an example that only a god is perfect, face it, it is only an illusion we use to cushion our mistakes. I'm about to question, if god was perfect, and is believed to have created mankind, and that humans were a creation by god. In context to my disbelief as much as disapproval, I fail to allege a predefined gender or assume any physical features. Would picture perfect be an ideal issue? It is an impossible issue to deny but then, why is only "god" perfect but creations by god are not? The grand design as many call it, flawed in many diversions but why not as pristine as the supposed creator? Since this psychological issue of a god is depicted to be virtuous and magnanimous, how then, does famine fill the hearts of thousands, hospitals be a requirement everywhere, grief fill the souls of millions?
I'm beginning an argument that this god as percieved my millions is just an alter ego, much similar to a person with MPD or multiple personality disorder and they choose to seek solace in. When the bible writes about this person "Christ" disappearing from his tomb, could it be that "Christ" was never there? When the pastors preach about god from the bible, was the bible written by a god or fellow humans? When church-goes digest the speeches delivered by a pastor and decide to influence the general public to believe in their god. Let me discriminate against a minority of christians who take it in their stride to 'recruit' members into their facultative association which by my assessment, what respect do they expect when they do not even give it to whom they want it from. They claim that the buddhists are only contributing to the global warming and that effigies are just statues. How does that decide where they stand in my rating list? They just added olive oil to their pathway to the last. An escape from the realities of life are put into the visions of a god. Biasness is not against any other, but happenings are meant to be stated as history is to be taken note of. It intrigues me to see how people believe in heaven and hell when, no one has ever been there.

Interests of two souls will vary but the visions is being depicted to be equal when an overinfluential biased picture is being placed in front of them.

Is the pope picture perfect? Not in my homo point of view. His mouth should be bleached with hydrocloric acid a million times over for every statement of discriminance he makes. Now that he is dead, I apprecieate that much thus far. Stereotypical minds only think that a affinity between a male and a female is 'correct' but I challence, who defines correct. Homosexuality is not the very least accepted by a vast society while hetrosexuality is presumed without judgement, heck the United States cannot even decide on a united opinion requiring to the extent of different jurisdictions to each state, it does show how united the America's are. Discrimination between the same nationality cannot even be resolved let alone jurisdictions. The dead pope spoke of homosexuality as sinners, when sinners are defined by human.

Yep, the pope the dead, hooray or cheeros? Despair or rainfalls from within? It poured the following day, and what did his "obedient" followers say? We're blessed by him...or god is crying for him too... yes...you may agree, sorry, i don't. Here in singapore the it shined like always. Guess what those "holy" people state? Enlightenment. Ha....Bull****. Sorry, i wasn't trying to be nasty, or should i be? Yes...he's dead, props for him being a good leader( i think), crying and moaning... but besides that hell, he's just an old man. Do that for me when i'm dead and i may re-consider. **Wishful thinking**

How far are we actually facing reality apart from hiding behind a front we choose to depict.

Comments are meant to be stated as much as free speech constitutes a right. The power of the people are defined by other people, the rights of people are defined by other people, the likes of god are defined by people, the cause for discrimination is defined by people the person who decides a sentence whether or not a someone elses' life is revised is judged by other people. So what gives a certain group of people the authority to excercise power across someone else? Ponder, it feeds the soul.

More discriminations are written at http://toget.to/lestat/ I love to listen to the diverse voices.

~Frozen Lestat~ & ~Ace~